KIGALI, Rwanda — Soccer’s 2026 World Cup in North America, already the largest and the longest in the tournament’s history because of an expansion of the field, is growing even more as FIFA leaders agreed to a change in format that will add 24 more games than originally planned.
The change will result in a marathon men’s soccer championship — 48 teams playing 104 games over almost 40 days in three countries — and see the champion and the runner-up, as well as the third- and fourth-place teams, each play eight games instead of the current seven.
The format was approved Tuesday at a meeting of the governing council of FIFA, soccer’s global governing body and the organizer of the World Cup.
“I think it’s a good idea,” Victor Montagliani, a FIFA vice president and head of soccer in North America, told reporters after the meeting.
The total of 104 World Cup matches will be a significant increase from previous plans that had called for 80 games, and 40 more than last year’s tournament in Qatar, which featured 32 teams. Montagliani said the footprint of the event would not be larger than the World Cups in 2014 and 2018, the last to be staged using the event’s traditional June-July calendar.
The change will also force organizers to clear more dates in the 16 cities they have chosen to host the World Cup, a potentially difficult dance for stadium officials juggling a summer of sports, concerts and other events. Montagliani suggested there would be discussions to see how and where the additional games would be played, and he refused to rule out adding a host.
The 2026 tournament — hosted by the United States, Mexico and Canada — will be the first World Cup with 48 teams, up from the 32 nations that have competed since 1998.
Early discussions had centered on splitting the teams into 16 groups of three. But after the nail-biting finish to the group stage in Qatar last year, and with officials concerned about a situation in which three-team groups could be manipulated and teams would be eliminated after only two games, FIFA revisited the issue.
The heads of soccer’s six confederations met with FIFA’s president, Gianni Infantino, on Monday night, and none raised any objection to the proposed format. The formal confirmation came Tuesday, at a meeting of FIFA’s 36-member governing council, which typically rubber-stamps proposals agreed upon by the six regional heads.
Montagliani said the idea to change the format was crystallized after the Qatar World Cup, which featured several nail-biting finishes in the group stage. Final games were played simultaneously to ensure no single team could benefit from knowing the outcome of a rival’s game.
Adding extra games will also add extra days. Such a duration is likely to anger players’ unions and clubs concerned about the heavy workload imposed on the game’s stars. Montagliani said the tournament would be extended by up to seven days to accommodate the extra games.
The North American World Cup is the first version of the men’s tournament to have been awarded since Infantino became FIFA president in 2016. While the expansion has been celebrated by many of the governing body’s smaller member nations because of the expanded opportunities to qualify it will provide and the billions of dollars in added revenue it will produce, many fans and commentators expressed concerns the move would diminish the quality of the event.
Infantino has predicted the 2026 World Cup will generate a record-breaking payday; FIFA has budgeted for revenues of $11 billion in the four-year cycle to 2026, almost $4 billion more than it earned during the coinciding period for the Qatar World Cup.
One way of mitigating the impact of a longer tournament would be to reduce the preparation window for it. In previous years, it had been three weeks for qualified teams. (That window was shortened to a single week before the event in Qatar, the first to be played in November and December, placing it in the heart of the season for many domestic leagues.)
Montagliani said the call-up window would almost certainly be reduced to ensure the tournament stays within the window mapped out before Tuesday’s change, which could mean as many as six games played per day during the group stage.
Montagliani had earlier questioned whether the impact on player health would be as severe as players’ unions have warned.
“It’s only one more game,” he said, adding, “I think most teams will take that.”
There was also greater clarity about the future hosts of the 2030 World Cup, with Morocco poised to join a European bid that includes Spain, Portugal and Ukraine. The addition of Morocco would help the Europeans secure vital votes from African members in a competition with a multination offer from South America and a mooted Saudi Arabia-led bid that would include Egypt and Greece.
Morocco is among the most influential African countries within FIFA’s orbit and a serial World Cup bid loser. Its determination to forge ahead with another attempt to host the tournament was heightened when its national team became the first team from the African continent to reach the semifinals in Qatar.
FIFA also made other tournament decisions at the meeting. A new annual tournament for clubs is to be created for the winners of regional championships after FIFA announced that it agreed to a new 32-team World Cup for clubs, a quadrennial event with the first edition in 2025. That tournament, for which FIFA has yet to name a host, will see teams divided into eight groups of four teams, with the top two teams in each group advancing to a single-elimination event, a mirror image of the format used for the World Cup in Qatar.
It is unclear where FIFA will find extra space in the calendar for the 64-game Club World Cup, which will run longer than the Confederations Cup, a largely unloved national team competition scrapped after the last edition was played in Russia in 2017.